Thai University RankingsRESEARCH RADAR
← Back to research database
งานใหม่ที่น่าจับตา

Geospatial determinants of diabetes risk in Thailand: socioeconomic and health service factors

IMPACT SIGNAL73/100
01

Information from the abstract

Diabetes prevalence is increasing in Thailand, creating growing demands on the health system. Understanding the spatial distribution of diabetes risk and its association with socioeconomic and healthcare system factors among the diabetes risk population is critical for designing targeted prevention and intervention strategies. We examined the distribution of diabetes risk groups across provinces in Thailand with reference to the spatial association between economic, social and public health service factors based on data from the Ministry of Public Health's Health Data Center (HDC) for the year 2021. The dataset included 22,491,934 individuals across the 76 provinces as well as social, economic and public health services. The methods included Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Spatial Lag Model (SLM) and Spatial Error Model (SEM). Explanatory variables included average night-time light intensity, average monthly income, hospital-to-population ratio and proportion of the population with health insurance. Major clusters of High-High (HH) diabetes risk were identified by LISA mainly located in the North of Thailand. In all models, the direction and significance of the associations were consistent (p

02

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 73/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: Diabetes Management and Education · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance

03

Thai researcher and institutional participation

Withaya Polnakoo · Wongsa Laohasiriwong · Kittipong Sonlorm · Khon Kaen University

04

Data limitations

This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.