Information from the abstract
Background Clinical constraints often limit nursing students' independent decision-making in pediatric settings. This study evaluated the effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on pediatric nursing knowledge and clinical decision-making abilities. Method A quasi-experimental study using a one-group pretest posttest design was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students in Thailand. The SBL intervention was designed based on the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory and Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, featuring two realistic pediatric scenarios. Data were collected using a pediatric nursing knowledge test and self-reported clinical decision-making scale, then analyzed using paired t-tests. Results Post-intervention scores for pediatric nursing knowledge significantly increased from 6.47 to 8.00 ( p < .001). Clinical decision-making abilities also improved significantly from 3.84 to 4.41 ( p < .001), with "Effective Reflection" demonstrating the most prominent improvement. These findings suggest that scenario realism and psychological safety within the high-fidelity simulation (HFS) fostered self-confidence and error-based learning without patient risk. Conclusion SBL bridges the theory-practice gap and enhances clinical readiness through structured design and systematic reflection. Its integration into nursing curricula is recommended to maximize pediatric competency and prepare students for complex environments.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 76/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Problem and Project Based Learning
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Jintana Kasemsiri · Wanida Neranon · Penrat Kowpairoj · Navamindradhiraj University · Walailak University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.