Information from the abstract
Southern Thailand has experienced increased rainfall and variability due to climate change, making it essential to understand future rainfall patterns under different scenarios for risk assessment in water management. This study analyzes extreme rainfall using observations from 14 gauges and projections from 10 CMIP6 models across four SSP scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5). Bias correction, trend detection, and probability distribution fitting were applied to estimate return periods. Results revealed that bias-corrected ensemble rainfall performed best for all 14 stations. Significantly increasing rainfall trends were predominantly detected across the scenarios, with the strongest signal under SSP1-2.6 showing 13 out of 14 stations giving significant rainfall increases. The future monthly rainfall under all scenarios is projected to be higher, especially in the rainy season compared to the baseline, up to 83.8% and 95% for the east and west coasts, respectively. Substantial increments in the mid- and far-future periods (2040–2069 and 2070–2100) were indicated, particularly along the west coast, where extreme events such as 100-year return periods may significantly rise higher than 80% in some stations under SSP5-8.5, different from SSP1-2.6, with the change in between 30 and 50%. The findings provide critical evidence for climate-resilient water management and disaster preparedness in Southern Thailand.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 73/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Hydrology and Drought Analysis · Climate variability and models · Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Ketvara Sittichok · Kittiwet Kuntiyawichai · Raweepohn Narudeesri-utai · Kasetsart University · Khon Kaen University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.