Information from the abstract
Purpose: To assess the validity and reliability of the Indonesian Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS-I), including its four dimensions and 16 items, among Indonesian stroke survivors. Validation of the Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS) is recommended across various mental health contexts and community settings. However, construct validity, convergent validity, and reliability in particular have not been examined and validated among Indonesian stroke survivors. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 stroke survivors participated. The SSS was translated into Indonesian using Brislin’s back-translation method. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity. Results: CFA indicated a good model fit, with factor loadings for all items exceeding 0.30. The convergent validity, represented by the average variance extracted, ranged from 0.507 to 0.666, suggesting that the latent constructs explained more than 50% of the variance. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability, with a total Cronbach’s alpha of 0.917 and composite reliability ranging between 0.752 and 0.887. Conclusions: The Indonesian version of the SSS demonstrated preliminary evidence of internal consistency and construct validity, supporting its use for assessing stigma among stroke survivors, with further validation recommended. This instrument helps healthcare providers to understand Indonesian stroke survivors’ needs, supports decision-making, and enhances outcomes.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 70/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Acute Ischemic Stroke Management · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Thai researcher and institutional participation
I Gede Juanamasta · Rapin Polsook · Yupin Aungsuroch · Chulalongkorn University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.