Information from the abstract
Creative thinking is a vital skill for contemporary youth, especially in developing nations, where fostering innovation is crucial for navigating the middle-income trap. This study examines how a growth mindset and creative self-efficacy collectively influence creative thinking among students in Thailand as a case study for developing nations, using nationally representative data from the PISA 2022 assessment (N=8495). Our findings indicate that students with a growth mindset, particularly a creative growth mindset, achieve significantly higher creative thinking scores (4.3-8.9% higher) than their fixed-mindset peers. Furthermore, students with high creative self-efficacy score 9.2% higher. Applying the Integrated Constraints in Creativity (IConIC) model and the Creative Learning Process framework, we find that while higher socioeconomic status acts as a prerequisite for these mindsets to flourish, environmental factors such as large school and class sizes paradoxically serve as "focusing constraints" that provide necessary scaffolding for creative approaches. This suggests that a positive attitude alone is insufficient; it must be supported by an equitable and structured educational environment. Based on these insights, we propose policy recommendations for comprehensive educational reform, including constraint-leveraging teacher development and initiatives aimed at reducing educational inequality to foster the equitable development of creative thinking.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 81/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Piriya Pholphirul · Siwat Teimtad · National Institute of Development Administration · Ramkhamhaeng University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.