Information from the abstract
This article develops a cross-cultural theoretical model of moral-psychological transformation by reinterpreting Confucian self-cultivation as a system of ritualized embodiment. Situated within theoretical and philosophical psychology, the article asks how bodily discipline, ritual form, and culturally mediated repetition may reorganize attention, affect, conduct, habit, and moral agency. Drawing on embodied cognition, moral psychology, ritual theory, cultural psychology, and Confucian philosophical discourse, the study proposes the Confucian Embodied Self-Cultivation Model. The model is grounded in close readings of selected classical formulations, especially keji fuli wei ren (克己复礼为仁) in the Analects and wu bu jing, yan ruo si (毋不敬,俨若思) in the Liji, and is historically illustrated through late-imperial lineage-based ancestral ritual practices, with Huizhou lineages used as a strategic analytic case rather than a representative sample of all Confucian traditions. The model identifies five interrelated dimensions: embodied moral agency, ritualized attention and affect regulation, repeated embodied self-cultivation, immanent psychological transformation, and cultural-institutional mediation. It argues that Confucian ritual should not be understood only as symbolic representation, ethical convention, or religious expression, but also as a culturally organized technology of self-regulation, habit formation, public accountability, and moral subject formation. By reframing Confucian cultivation in psychological terms, the article contributes to theoretical and philosophical psychology by expanding accounts of selfhood, moral agency, and psychological change beyond individualist, cognitivist, and belief-centered models. It concludes by formulating testable propositions for future research on embodied cognition, moral development, ritual participation, affect regulation, and culturally mediated self-cultivation.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 85/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Cultural Differences and Values · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Action Observation and Synchronization
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Sarawadee Phuchomsri · Jiyu Li · Khon Kaen University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.