Information from the abstract
Flooding is a destructive natural hazard intensified by climate change, posing challenges to sustainable disaster risk management. This study developed and evaluated machine learning models for flood severity prediction within a hexagonal grid system (H3, resolution 8) under rainy season conditions in Maha Sarakham, Thailand. Four models Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained using 11 environmental variables across historical years (2018, 2021, 2022) and tested on a projected year (2025) under SSP scenarios. XGBoost demonstrated the most stable performance (accuracy > 0.95 across all years), while SVM achieved high historical accuracy (0.970 average) but failed to detect positive flood cases in 2025 (recall = 0), highlighting the importance of temporal validation. Topographic variables were the most consistent predictors, but NSMI (soil moisture) emerged as the top SHAP predictor in 2025 (r = 0.52), suggesting a shift in flood-generating mechanisms under climate change. A polarization pattern was observed: flood-affected area declined to 6.8% in 2025 (79% reduction from 2022), yet maximum flood point counts remained high at 14.0, indicating more concentrated but intense flooding. Under SSP projections, using the historical baseline (27.5%), SSP1-2.6 (45.2%) and SSP2-4.5 (45.0%) indicate increased flood risk relative to the historical baseline through 2040. The SSP5-8.5 projection (3.4%) is identified as a model extrapolation artifact through formal out-of-distribution assessment (Mahalanobis distance = 8.72, p < 0.001) and is therefore excluded from policy recommendations. Although GRU and LSTM achieved marginally higher AUC values in retrospective validation, we recommend XGBoost for operational forecasting due to its temporal stability, computational efficiency, and interpretability. We further recommend integrating real-time soil moisture monitoring into early warning systems and shifting to hotspot-targeted adaptation strategies.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 72/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Narueset Prasertsri · Patiwat Littidej · Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj · Mahasarakham University · Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.