Information from the abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into the communication industry is reshaping how messages are formed, distributed, and understood. Moving beyond earlier claims of digital transformation, this paper argues that the industry is now entering a phase of intelligence maturity, where AI systems increasingly mediate both the channels and content of communication. Based on a structured literature review of 85 peer-reviewed sources published between 2020 and 2026, the analysis shows that AI has shifted from a tactical support tool to a strategic actor within socio-technical systems. In content creation, generative AI has lowered production barriers, enabled personalization at scale, and challenged traditional notions of authorship and authenticity. At the same time, these developments raise socio-ethical concerns, including a widening AI divide, algorithmic bias, and the spread of synthetic media. Rather than replacing human roles, the paper finds that the industry is moving toward a co-intelligence model, where AI handles computationally intensive tasks and humans retain strategic direction, ethical oversight, and cultural judgment. The paper contributes a systematic conceptualization of co-intelligence that distinguishes it from existing constructs such as hybrid intelligence, intelligence augmentation, and human-in-the-loop systems by specifying its organizational and governance dimensions. Successful co-intelligence depends on leadership, data culture, and governance frameworks. The paper therefore conceptualizes co-intelligence as the combination of AI's analytical capacity with human empathy, ethics, and strategic insight.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 83/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Mohamed Mallek · Thaksin University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.