Examining the Roles of Women in the Armed Resistance Movement in Karen State, Myanmar

Information from the abstract

This study explores women’s participation in the 2021 armed resistance movement in Karen State, Myanmar—an area deeply affected by ongoing conflict. While armed struggles are often portrayed through a male-dominated lens, the extent of women’s involvement, motivations, and struggles remains underexplored. This research seeks to address that gap and highlight women’s unique experiences in conflict-affected areas to promote more inclusive and effective post-conflict solutions. Using qualitative research methods, the study draws on in-depth interviews and observations of key participants, including members of the Karen National Union, civil society members, and individuals involved in the Civil Disobedience Movement. These methods were employed to gain an understanding of women’s roles, motivations, and the socio-cultural challenges they face in the resistance movement. The findings reveal diverse and challenging roles of women—from supporters and community organizers to leaders—highlighting a remarkable shift in traditional gender norms. Women in Karen State have increasingly taken public and political responsibilities, redefining their roles from passive victims to active agents of change. The study underscores the transformative impact of women’s participation in shaping local governance and advancing gender equality within conflict and post-conflict settings. HighlightsThis study offers empirical insight into the participation of women in Karen State in Myanmar’s armed resistance movement, highlighting their roles beyond conventional support functions. It shows how women’s engagement challenges gender hierarchies, reshapes power dynamics, and contributes to renegotiating social norms. The findings also provide practical implications for gender-responsive peacebuilding and inclusive post-conflict governance.

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 81/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict