Information from the abstract
ABSTRACT Smallholder agricultural projects are central to rural poverty reduction, yet their distributional outcomes remain underexplored. Using mixed methods (qualitative interviews and an 804‐household survey analysed via PSM‐DID), this paper examines a decade‐long Malawi project deemed successful by conventional metrics. Project participation raised income by 15%–20% overall, but surplus‐selling farmers gained 32%–48% more than subsistence farmers and a four‐group analysis reveals project‐driven amplification of pre‐existing inequality. We argue that market‐oriented interventions can institutionalise rural differentiation and produce new forms of poverty. Programme design and evaluation must therefore attend to intra‐community equity, disaggregating outcomes by baseline assets and gender rather than relying on aggregate averages.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 80/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Junghee Bae · Chulalongkorn University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.