An Integrated Community-Based Model for Chronic Disease Care in a Community in the Lower Southern Peninsular Thailand

Information from the abstract

Effective chronic disease management requires community-based approaches tailored to local contexts. This study sought to develop an integrated community-based model for chronic disease care in a community in the lower southern peninsular Thailand. It was a research and development (R&D) study consisting of three phases: Phase 1 identified situational factors through focus group discussions; Phase 2 produced a model validated by three experts using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument; and Phase 3 employed a one-group pretest-posttest design to implement the model and evaluate outcomes over three months. Key informants included 30 patients with non-communicable chronic diseases and 15 healthcare professionals. Data analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics, paired-samples t-test, and content analysis. The study found that the integrated community-based model for chronic disease management consisted of three main components. First, individual participation (focusing on shared goal setting and risk awareness); Second, interpersonal participation (involving peer support and structured information/feedback exchange); and finally, community participation (including positive motivation, community-based healthcare activities, and surveillance). The results show that after the patients were taken care of with the integrated community-based model for three months, the average HbA1C (glycated hemoglobin) levels among chronic disease patients had significantly decreased by 0.10 (95% CI [0.04–0.16]), and the average systolic blood pressure had significantly decreased by 4.70 mmHg (95% CI [2.32–7.07]). Chronic disease clinics in comparable rural settings can adopt this three-tiered participation structure within existing services, with village health volunteers and community groups recognized as partners in care.

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 85/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: Diabetes Management and Education · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Community Health and Development