Information from the abstract
Leptospirosis is a major cause of acute febrile illness in tropical regions, particularly in flood-prone settings. Accurate diagnosis remains challenging, especially during the early phase of infection, because of the nonspecific clinical manifestations and stage-dependent limitations of the available diagnostic tests. Consequently, delayed recognition and treatment continue to contribute to adverse outcomes.This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the current diagnostic modalities for leptospirosis, encompassing both clinical prediction scores (the THAI-LEPTO and OPD Lepto scores) and laboratory techniques (microscopy, culture, molecular assays, and serology), emphasizing the integration of clinical assessment with laboratory testing across different stages of the disease. The diagnostic implications of the biphasic course are highlighted, underscoring the importance of aligning test selection with illness timing. Clinical diagnosis and structured scoring systems are reviewed as tools to support presumptive diagnosis when confirmatory testing is unavailable or inconclusive. Conventional laboratory methods, including dark-field microscopy, culture, and serological assays, are discussed alongside molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction–based testing. By clarifying the strengths and limitations of each modality, this review aims to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate tests, interpreting results within clinical contexts, and initiating timely therapy.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 71/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Leptospirosis research and findings · Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research · Zoonotic diseases and public health
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Sorawit Chittrakarn · Smonrapat Surasombatpattana · Prince of Songkla University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.