Thai University RankingsRESEARCH RADAR
← Back to research database
มีศักยภาพระดับโลก

Campus (Dis)comfort: the emotional and political struggles of LGBTQ + students in Thai universities

IMPACT SIGNAL89/100
01

Information from the abstract

Drawing on the Communication Theory of Identity and Inclusion and Resilience Theory, this study examines the lived experiences of LGBTQ + students in Thai higher education, focusing on their perceptions of campus climate, inclusion, and institutional support. Utilizing a qualitative phenomenological approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with LGBTQ + students to investigate the complex challenges they encounter, including microaggressions, discrimination, invisibility, and the navigation of intersecting identities such as gender, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Three major themes, including 1) Uneven Climates of Gender Inclusion, 2) Beneath the Surface: Emotional Well-being and Identity Navigation, and 3) From Visibility to Voice: Activism, Leadership and Institutional Resistance, emerged from the data and demonstrate how LGBTQ + students engage in advocacy and leadership to promote inclusion and develop coping strategies. The findings enhance understanding of LGBTQ + inclusion in Thai higher education, exposing discrepancies between policy and practice and underscoring the need for culturally responsive, intersectional, and pragmatic strategies to foster inclusive, supportive, and equitable campus environments.

02

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 89/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Higher Education Research Studies · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

03

Thai researcher and institutional participation

Nuntiya Doungphummes · Matthana Rodyim · Sunida Siwapathomchai · Mahidol University

04

Data limitations

This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.