Information from the abstract
The multiplicative Holt–Winters method estimates its trend by exponentially smoothing successive level differences, a single-pass recursion that inherits the noise contained in each level update. We propose HW-DDS, a variant in which the trend is instead obtained by applying Brown’s double smoothing to the level itself, together with a damping factor. Because the level carries the trend as a growing quantity, the lag between the single- and double-smoothed level recovers the slope directly, whereas the same construction applied to the level difference would collapse. Three properties are established: the trend estimator is asymptotically unbiased for the slope of a linear trend, so the undamped method yields unbiased forecasts; the recursion is asymptotically stable for every admissible parameter value; and under independent level noise the double-smoothed trend has strictly smaller variance than the Holt–Winters trend, by a factor given in closed form, between roughly 0.06 and 0.42 over the practical parameter range. Simulation confirms both asymptotic results to within numerical tolerance and delimits them under estimated seasonality, autocorrelated noise and structural breaks. On five real monthly series the method is broadly competitive with the Holt–Winters variants: across thirty rolling-origin comparisons no difference in predictive accuracy survives correction for multiple testing.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 72/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Statistical and numerical algorithms
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Kamonchat Trachoo · Inthira Chaiya · Pakorn Khwankaew · Sukanya Intarapak · Din Prathumwan · Mahasarakham University · Srinakharinwirot University · Khon Kaen University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.