Information from the abstract
BackgroundThe optimal approach to fixation techniques in cartilage repair of the ankle remains unclear due to the predominance of low-quality evidence and limited high-level studies. To address this gap, an international group of experts convened to establish consensus-based recommendations grounded in the best available evidence, formulated during the 2017 International Congress on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.MethodsSeventy-five multidisciplinary experts from 25 countries and 1 territory participated in a structured Delphi-based consensus process. Eleven working groups were tasked with reviewing specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, conducting systematic literature reviews, and grading evidence to support each statement. Statements lacking full agreement were further discussed and refined before final voting. Consensus strength was defined as consensus (51%-74%), strong consensus (75%-99%), or unanimous (100%).ResultsFifteen consensus statements related to fixation techniques were developed and all achieved strong consensus, with a minimum agreement level of 82%. These statements provide standardized guidance on indications, technical considerations, and expected outcomes for fixation procedures in osteochondral lesions of the talus.ConclusionThis synthesis of the international expert consensus statements offers unified recommendations to guide the use of fixation techniques in the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus, fostering greater consistency in clinical practice, research methodology, and future guideline development.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 71/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Foot and Ankle Surgery · Bone fractures and treatments · Tendon Structure and Treatment
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Tanawat Vaseenon · Chiang Mai University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.