Information from the abstract
Environmental problem-solving (EPS) is often assessed after instruction, limiting insight into how students demonstrate it during project work. This interpretive qualitative study examined EPS patterns among 35 Grade 8 students in a Thai secondary school during a 20-week project organized around the characteristics of an emancipatory approach. Three reflective journals provided primary evidence, while group worksheets and final presentations contextualized and corroborated students’ accounts. Hybrid deductive–inductive content analysis used five EPS components as initial codes while allowing patterns to emerge inductively. An end-of-project situational assessment provided complementary descriptive evidence without determining pattern assignment. Three overlapping patterns emerged: evidence-informed, action-oriented, and social change-oriented patterns. Students in the same course, and sometimes working on the same project, placed different recurring emphases on evidence, action, reflection, and participation. The patterns represented neither stable types nor competence levels. Assessment scores fell mainly within the 31–45 range (n = 29); six students scored 16–30, and none scored 0–15. Without a baseline, this distribution describes end-of-project performance, not improvement. The patterns provide a context-sensitive lens for examining individual variation that overall scores and group-level accounts may obscure and for investigating how EPS emphases emerge, overlap, and change across contexts and over time.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 81/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Environmental and sustainability education · Science Education and Pedagogy · Problem and Project Based Learning
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Kraisujit Khidkhan · Jeerawan Ketsing · Kasetsart University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.