Information from the abstract
Scientific literacy is widely recognised as a fundamental competency that enables individuals to engage with science-related issues in social, technological, and environmental contexts and to make informed, evidence-based decisions. This study aimed to develop and validate an integrated instructional model based on the science, technology, society, and environment (STSE) approach combined with simulation-based learning (SBL) to support scientific literacy. A mixed-methods exploratory sequential design was employed. In the first phase, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 13 educational stakeholders. The data were analysed using thematic analysis, through which key themes were identified and synthesised into five essential dimensions: learning context, instructional process, media and tools, roles of teachers and students, and assessment and evaluation. In the second phase, quantitative data were collected from science teachers and analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the model. The findings indicated that the proposed model demonstrated excellent fit, confirming its construction validity and reliability. Among the five dimensions, learning context and instructional process emerged as the most influential. These findings suggest that the STSE–SBL model provides a theoretically grounded and empirically validated framework for designing contextualised science instruction aimed at supporting scientific literacy.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 82/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Science Education and Pedagogy · Science Education and Perceptions · STEM Education
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Muhammadkhoiri Hayibaka · Lilla Adulyasas · Roseleena Anantanukulwong · Yala Rajabhat University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.