Thai University RankingsRESEARCH RADAR
← Back to research database
มีหลักฐานผลกระทบระดับโลก

Repurposing adult AI radiograph models for neonatal care through continual learning: an international multicentre study

IMPACT SIGNAL92/100
01

Information from the abstract

Despite growing clinical adoption of artificial intelligence in radiology, fewer than one in five commercially available models are cleared for paediatric use. Existing systems are trained predominantly on adult data and generalize poorly to neonates, yet efficient strategies for repurposing them without data sharing or large-scale local data curation are lacking. Here we present an international retrospective study of neonatal chest radiographs from 30 neonatal intensive care units across 20 countries and territories, evaluating continual learning as a privacy-preserving approach to adapt a deep learning model for adult endotracheal tube assessment to neonatal care. Each hospital contributed 50 radiographs for sequential model retraining without centralized data pooling. Continual learning achieved lower anatomical landmark localization error (0.67 cm versus 1.29 cm for hospital-specific fine-tuning and 4.30 cm for adult-only models) at 29 of 30 sites, with improved detection of deep intubations at 27 of 30 sites. These findings demonstrate that privacy-preserving collaborative learning can address critical gaps in paediatric AI deployment.

02

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 92/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI

03

Thai researcher and institutional participation

Atchara Mahayosnond · Sira Sriswasdi · Piyapong Khumrin · Suphakris Tanmuk · Chulalongkorn University · Chiang Mai University · Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital

04

Data limitations

This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.