ข้อมูลจากบทคัดย่อ
ยังไม่มีสรุปภาษาไทยสำหรับระเบียนนี้
ด้านล่างเป็นบทคัดย่อต้นฉบับภาษาอังกฤษจากข้อมูลบรรณานุกรม โปรดตรวจบทความต้นฉบับก่อนอ้างอิง
Background and Objectives: The post-COVID-19 pandemic resurgence of Thailand's tourism industry and the proliferation of digital nomadism have substantially transformed tourism consumption patterns. While self-guided travel has expanded, licensed tour guides remain indispensable for niche tourism and organized group travel. Nevertheless, Thailand faces severe structural constraints arising from an acute shortage of tour guides proficient in diverse foreign languages, particularly Russian and Italian. This shortage has catalyzed the widespread proliferation of unauthorized tour guides, the prevalence of "sitting guides" (where licensed Thai guides permit unauthorized foreign nationals to conduct tours on their behalf), and predatory "zero-dollar tours" coupled with tourist headcount trading. Concurrently, the Tourism Business and Guide Act B.E. 2551 strictly reserves the tour guiding profession exclusively for Thai nationals, while imposing disproportionately lenient criminal sanctions that fail to achieve effective deterrence. This research aims to: 1) examine foundational concepts, principles, regulatory measures, and operational challenges confronting the tour guide profession in Thailand; 2) comparatively analyze tour guide legislation across Thailand, the United States, and South Korea; and 3) propose legal and policy reform pathways to resolve contemporary tour guiding dilemmas in Thailand in alignment with evolving socioeconomic conditions.Methods: This study employs a qualitative documentary research design, systematically synthesizing and examining statutory provisions, subordinate legislation, academic literature, judicial precedents, and official statistical reports. Grounded in a comparative legal framework, the inquiry evaluates legal systems not merely through statutory texts, but in relation to their underlying societal dynamics, economic policies, and empirical enforcement conditions. A comparative analysis is conducted across Thai legislation, the United States legal framework (specifically Washington State and federal provisions), and South Korea's Tourism Promotion Act across four core dimensions: statutory scope and legislative objectives, legal definitions of tour guides, regulatory and supervisory mechanisms, and promotional measures and fiscal incentives.Results: The findings indicate three major operational and statutory deficiencies in Thailand: 1) regarding sitting guides under Section 60 of the Tourism Business and Guide Act B.E. 2551, the statute lacks direct penal provisions holding complicit tour operators accountable, and the conduct does not constitute statutory grounds for license suspension or revocation under Section 63; 2) regarding zero-dollar tours and headcount trading under Sections 31, 32, and 58, administrative pricing minimums and optional tour fee caps fail to reflect actual operating costs, while unstable compensation structures incentivize tourist exploitation; and 3) criminal penalties under Section 89 are overly lenient and fail to deter recidivism. Conversely, the comparative analysis reveals that the United States imposes no nationality restrictions on tour guides, relying instead on professional competency examinations and strict regulatory enforcement over commercial activities in public spaces. Similarly, South Korea permits individuals of any nationality to obtain a tour guide license under the National Technical Qualification Act, enforcing rigorous language proficiency testing and professional standards while supporting the industry through the Tourism Promotion and Development Fund and targeted tax incentives. These findings demonstrate that while Thai law focuses primarily on market control and nationality-based exclusion, foreign jurisdictions prioritize professional competency standards and proactive industry promotion.Application of this study: The findings provide actionable legal and policy recommendations across two principal dimensions: 1) Statutory Reform: Amending the Ministry of Labour Notification issued under the Emergency Decree on Non-Thais' Working Management B.E. 2560 to authorize qualified foreign nationals to perform tour guiding duties in formal co-working arrangements with Thai guides under a regulated licensing system; strengthening legal mechanisms to suppress nominee-controlled tour companies; and adopting a day-fine system in penal sanctions to ensure equitable economic deterrence and prevent repeat offenses; and 2) Policy and Professional Governance: Establishing an autonomous "Professional Tour Guide Council" responsible for licensing, ethical oversight, and a three-tiered certification curriculum (basic, intermediate, advanced) alongside mandatory annual refresher training; formally certifying "Specialized Tour Guides" in niche fields such as history, cultural heritage, and ecotourism; and amending the Revenue Code to allow individual tour guides to deduct professional development and training expenses at a rate exceeding 100 percent of actual incurred costs.Conclusion: Transforming Thailand's tour guide legislation necessitates a fundamental paradigm shift from nationality-based market exclusion toward professional standard enhancement and systemic industry promotion. Authorizing foreign tour guides under regulated licensing, establishing a Professional Tour Guide Council, certifying specialized tour guides, implementing a day-fine penal model, and providing fiscal tax relief constitute an integrated structural framework to resolve sitting guides and zero-dollar tours effectively. These measures will ensure robust consumer protection for tourists, enhance occupational stability for practitioners, and bolster the long-term international competitiveness of Thailand's tourism sector.
เหตุผลที่อยู่ในฐานติดตาม
ระเบียนนี้ได้รับ Impact Signal 79/100 จากความใหม่ แหล่งเผยแพร่ ความร่วมมือ และสัญญาณในข้อมูลบรรณานุกรม คะแนนนี้ใช้จัดลำดับการติดตาม ไม่ใช่การตัดสินคุณภาพงานวิจัย
ประเด็นที่เกี่ยวข้อง: Comparative International Legal Studies · Comparative and International Law Studies · Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
บทบาทของนักวิจัยและสถาบันไทย
Chaiyut Tawharanurak · Thammasat University
ข้อจำกัดของข้อมูล
หน้านี้เป็นระเบียนบรรณานุกรมและข้อมูลจากบทคัดย่อ ยังไม่ใช่บทวิเคราะห์ฉบับเต็มหรือการประเมินคุณภาพงานวิจัย ควรตรวจสอบ DOI และเอกสารต้นฉบับก่อนนำไปอ้างอิง