Thai University RankingsRESEARCH RADAR
← Back to research database
มีศักยภาพระดับโลก

Practical Bedside Tests for Assessing Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) in Anesthetized Patients

IMPACT SIGNAL85/100
01

Information from the abstract

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD)—characterized by deficits in memory, executive function, and processing speed—is a prevalent yet frequently underrecognized complication of surgery and anesthesia. POCD is associated with protracted recovery, diminished quality of life, and adverse long-term outcomes, particularly among elderly and high-risk populations. While early detection via bedside cognitive tests is vital for optimizing postoperative care, more comprehensive gold-standard neuropsychological batteries remain largely unfeasible in routine clinical practice due to significant time, cost, and resource constraints. This narrative review evaluates the clinical utility of practical bedside cognitive assessments for identifying POCD. Commonly employed tools—including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test (TMT), Digit Span, Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS)—are critically appraised regarding their sensitivity, limitations, and suitability for the perioperative environment. The review specifically addresses feasibility in acute postoperative settings, accounting for confounding factors such as age, literacy, and sensory or motor impairments. Furthermore, the necessity of establishing baseline cognitive status and the urgent need for tool validation within surgical cohorts are highlighted. No single bedside instrument offers a sufficiently comprehensive assessment for POCD. Rather, a multimodal approach—integrating high-sensitivity tools like the MoCA or TMT with rapid screening instruments—represents a more robust and clinically viable strategy for early detection. Future research must focus on standardizing assessment protocols and validating these tools across diverse surgical populations to ultimately enhance the quality of postoperative cognitive care.

02

Why this record is monitored

This record has an Impact Signal of 85/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.

Related topics: Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

03

Thai researcher and institutional participation

Sirijunya Junyatham · Napichayakarn Phanthananphokhin · Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal · Siriraj Hospital · Mahidol University

04

Data limitations

This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.